Important Links

Hock's Blog

Hock's Downloads

CQC-Facebook

Hock's Facebook

Hock's Seminars

Hock's Shopsite

Hock's Web Page


New Products

Combat Kicks VID

Critical Contact VID

Death Grip of Knife VID

Dominant/Counter VID

First Contact VID

Impact Weapons Book

Knife Book

The Other Hand VID


Lauric Enterprises, Inc.
1314 W. McDermott
Ste 106-811
Allen, TX 75013
972-390-1777

 

 

 


W. Hock Hochheim's

           Combat Centric

Talk Forum for Military, Police, Martial Artists and Aware Citizenry



Hock Hochheim's Combat Talk Forum

  • January 21, 2018, 08:22:52 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: A new triangle of death  (Read 2671 times)

Hock

  • Administrator
  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 6372
    • www.HocksCQC.com
A new triangle of death
« on: March 08, 2008, 06:55:30 AM »

We usually think of the "sniper's triangle," shooting (or hitting" the triangle ot eh two eyes and nose, now Force Science has mentioned a new trianble that patch of white -shirt, ABOVE THE VEST, that sticks out between your two collars and the top button of your shirt. (Please do me a favor? While reading this also, think of the everyone carryting a small flashlight on oy beside your handun?)


Triangle of Death": Is the threat real?

The rumor bouncing around law enforcement piqued Cmdr. Michael Richards' curiosity.
Street gangs in California, the story went, were training members to shoot cops at night by aiming for the highly visible patch of white T-shirt exposed above the top of many officers' vests. "The Triangle of Death," posters to the listservs called it.

Whether the rumor was fact or fiction, Richards wondered: Just how dangerous is this so-called Triangle of Death for LEOs?

He set up a little experiment that he says shocked him.

On the indoor range of his department, Mundelein (IL) PD, an agency of 50 sworn in a suburb northwest of Chicago, he positioned a 6 ft.-tall mannequin target, buttoned a blue uniform shirt on it, and slipped a sheet of white, legal-sized paper behind the shirt so that just enough was exposed at the top to simulate a bit of T-shirt.

He then dimmed the lighting to resemble "what you'd find in an older residential neighborhood, with some streetlamps and a lot of heavy trees," he told Force Science News. "You could make out the target, but you had to strain to really see what was going on." In other words, a lot like normal nighttime patrol conditions in many areas. From the control booth, Richards says, "the contrast between the patch of white paper and the dark shirt was really obvious."

One at a time, he brought in a series of randomly selected officers he knew, as the department's rangemaster, to be "average" shooters. "They typically qualify with low numbers, don't necessarily like to shoot and go to the range only because they have to," he explained. "I figured they'd be like the typical suspect who gets into a shooting with an officer-not overly proficient with a handgun. I didn't want any of the top shooters involved."

Explaining only that this was a "quick course in low-light shooting" so as not to tip off the true point of the test, Richards led each officer to a spot about 10 feet in front of the target. He told each to draw at the sound of a timer buzzer, step to the left or to the right, come up on target, fire 3 rounds as fast as possible, then scan the area. By incorporating movement, scanning and time pressure, "I wanted to distract them from thinking too much about the target."

Each officer fired a total of 18 rounds (6 sets of 3 shots apiece), using his duty pistol (either a .40-cal. Glock or a Sig). After an officer finished, the "T-shirt" was changed before the next test subject was brought in.

"The shot placement was shocking" when he analyzed the results, Richards says. "On our department we train to shoot center mass, usually using flat, 2-dimensional targets on a fully lit range. In training, our shots consistently tend to go to the center. If officers are shooting at high speed, their rounds may drop down toward the stomach, but they don't often go higher."

In his low-light experiment, by contrast, more than 80% of the shots across all the officers and all sets of fire hit in or immediately around the Triangle of Death simulated by the peek of white paper. In other words, Richards concluded, in low light they overrode their training and focused their shots on what was most vividly visible. All the officers confirmed in a post-shooting debrief that the patch of white had drawn their aim.

"Absolutely right," says Dr. Bill Lewinski, executive director of the Force Science Research Center at Minnesota State University-Mankato. Although Richards' sample was limited (only 6 officers) and his methods admittedly not scientifically pristine, the thrust of his experiment and his thinking are right on track, Lewinski maintains.

"Our research on attention shows that when people are trying to understand what is happening in a stressful, uncertain situation, they scan the scene quickly and grasp little bits of available information," he explains. "This process is automatic, almost instinctive. For the most part, their attention is attracted to something first and then shortly after that they recognize why it caught their attention.

"This was verified in one Force Science study in which officers were thrust into a rapidly evolving, very complex and dynamic situation. Their immediate response was to scan the scene in an effort to understand it. In doing so, they reported picking up noticeable elements of each person they scanned. Something about that person attracted their attention to a particular body part, article of clothing or motion.

"The same phenomenon is at work with the 'Triangle of death' under low-light conditions. The brightest part of the officer's body is automatically drawing the attention and the gunfire of subjects intent on attacking."

Firearms expert Ron Avery, a technical advisor to the FSRC, notices the same low-light aiming tendency that Richards documented when he's training officers from a wide variety of agencies through his Practical Shooting Academy (Visit the site).

As he puts it: "People shoot at what they can see, what they can focus on, not at what you train them. In low-light conditions, movement, shine, contrast and outline (silhouette) all become target indicators to a potential attacker. Shooters tend impulsively to take the target of opportunity, and when time is not working in their favor the target of opportunity is whatever is most noticeable."

The problem is by no means limited just to white T-shirts under a dark uniform, Avery emphasizes. "Light-colored shoulder patches, shiny badges, bright metal on hats, an activated flashlight-anything that creates a contrast can be dangerous. In semi-darkness like ambient moonlight, even sweat on your face and hands can be reflective."

For safety, he says, "you want to minimize yourself as a target." This includes keeping your clothing low-contrast, staying in shadows as much as possible at night when you're moving or pausing to observe, and being aware of your background environment."

So far as the Triangle of Death is concerned, "Don't equate looking professional with wearing a crisp white T-shirt under your uniform," Avery cautions. "Dress for your mission: that's the dress code for the modern officer."

Cmdr. Richards now urges all his officers to wear dark T-shirts on duty. He and all the department's firearms instructors do so, as a show of "leadership by example." Most patrol officers have followed suit. A few officers still wear white, unmindful of what Avery calls "a no-brainer."

[Our thanks to Jeff Chudwin, chief of the Olympia Fields (Ill.) PD and master of an outstanding law enforcement listserv, for tipping us to Cmdr. Richards' experiment.]


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


What does this do to the new, small flashlight industry? Where eberone is brainwashed to carry their light in a support hand in fornt of their face or chest. I think this subject and study has unintended consequences. The study can be extrapolated into bad guys also quickly "shooting at the light." This is not good news for the "flashlight mafia."


And...the next should should be abot big chest badges.

Hock
« Last Edit: March 14, 2008, 03:37:24 AM by Hock »
Logged

whitewolf

  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 4702
Re: A new trianle of death
« Reply #1 on: March 08, 2008, 10:12:42 PM »

Hock-i dont carry a pistol any  more -But after reading this I said to  my self-Ask Hock to check up on a H2H student-would he also attack a specific part of body  or clothing that stands out-does that make sense? Thought we could get some feedback from you on that -whitewolf
Logged

Hock

  • Administrator
  • Level 4
  • *****
  • Posts: 6372
    • www.HocksCQC.com
Re: A new trianle of death
« Reply #2 on: March 09, 2008, 11:34:34 AM »

I don' think so and there are no studies I know of that worked on that.

There have been a few studies that say there is a segment of mankind that has an aversion to striking the human face, and there is another segment that will strike the face and choke the neck out of anger. Nothing on clothing.

There is some info that people will fixate and strike out at the weapon a person is holding. Instinctively grabbing a gun, gun limb or stick, stick limb and knife limb.
They also attack those weapons with weapons.

Hock

michael

  • Level 3
  • ****
  • Posts: 221
Re: A new trianle of death
« Reply #3 on: March 13, 2008, 08:37:01 PM »

My department not only has the "triangle of death", but we also have nice, shiny, silver buttons on the front of our shirts. :o
Logged
**To be a warrior is not a simple matter of wishing to be one. It is rather an endless struggle that will go on to the very last moment of our lives. Nobody is born a warrior, in exactly the same way that nobody is born an average man. We make ourselves into one or the other.** Carlos Castaneda
 

Download