I wonder what the MAJORITY of other 65 year olds in the US ,who DO NOT have a fire arm,( as HANDY as Mr Daniel's was) ,do when they are supposedly victims of a break in where the Intruder DOES NOT bring a weapon but gets one AFTER entry ?
Maybe MOST Cooperate,and then call the Police,especially if they KNOW the Intruder.
(I bet this is what they do in England as well)
Something fishy about this Great Story of self protection by use of a firearm.
I would bet that since the attacker broke in ,UNARMED,that when he broke in Mr Daniel's threatened to blow him away,and Mr Johnson ran and got the knife to try and protect himself and got shot and killed for it.
As unless Mr Daniels is some butt kicking 65 year old ,the young Mr Johnson should not have needed any weapon to subdue Mr Daniel's.
Then I wonder:
If Mr Daniel's had the pistol at Hand,why did he not just order the intruder,Mr Johnson to leave and or to lay on the floor,cover him and call the Police or Call a Neighbor ?
Why did he ALLOW him to go the Kitchen and Hunt for and find a Knife ?
(perhaps to kill him and claim self defense ?)
quote from article:
"Johnson was questioned and released with no charges filed, though police say the case will be reviewed by the prosecutor.
Authorities do not know why Daniel barged into the residence. Johnson told investigators that Daniel is " a male he knows from the neighborhood," according to the report."
Looks like a good case to follow as I bet more comes out when the Detectives REALLY Investigate.