A rather delightful article from the Washington Post. One of the tremendous casualties of the cold warriors was the "mission creep" that resulted in the obsession with starched uniforms, spit shined boots, and "grease" uniforms. As noted by General Jones in one of the reasons why the Corps went to their new utilities, the time and effort that was being devoted to uniform appearance was detrimental to the combat orientation that the Marines were supposed to be focussing on. Hence their shift to the wash'n'wear "digicammies" and no-shine boots. As long as the weapons are clean, the uniform relatively intact, and all appropriate protective gear is being worn, I think that problems being detailed with these units in Iraq should be a non-issue. Whenever you look at the pictures or film footage from WW2 and Korea, those soldiers and Marines were definately not worring about how they were wearing their sunglasses, whether their shirts were tucked in (if they were wearing them at all in some cases), and if they had their cover (headgear) with them...
Dan
Washington Post
April 4, 2005
Pg. 11
Opinions On Attire Not Quite Uniform
Some Troops in Northern Iraq Disagree With Rules on Their Appearance
By Steve Fainaru, Washington Post Foreign Service
MOSUL, Iraq -- Famished and sleep-deprived after a 48-hour combat mission, Spec. Rusty "Doc" Mauney shed his heavy body armor and headed for the chow hall. He was near the door when a booming voice halted him.
"Where's your headgear, soldier?" said the sergeant major.
Mauney stammered that he had been out on a mission all night and hadn't brought along his cap.
"You're not coming in here," snapped the officer, according to Mauney. "Just because you're in a combat zone doesn't mean you can blow off Army regulations."
A change in command last month at the forward operating base, or FOB, that serves as headquarters for U.S. forces in northern Iraq has dramatically altered the military culture here. A corps of disciplinarians that has come to be known to soldiers as the "Nine Disciples of FOB Courage" has launched a crackdown on inappropriately tucked-in shirts, improper use of sunglasses and even swearing.
The changes have led to a classic clash between the infantrymen who spend most days "outside the wire" and the vast number of rear-guard soldiers who rarely leave the base. Although many of the noncombat troops perform such critical functions as military intelligence and communications, the infantrymen lump them into a broad category known variously as "FOB Dwellers," "FOB Goblins" and "Fobbits."
"We call them 'Wire-Inees,' 'cause they never leave the wire," said Sgt. Michael Lukowksi, a 21-year-old infantryman from Portland, Ore. "They don't know what's out there."
The attire flap had nearly blown over before an unfortunate incident last month that confirmed many infantrymen's worst stereotypes. An information operations officer venturing outside for just the second time discharged his M-16 assault rifle inside a Stryker attack vehicle. About 20 bullet fragments and pieces of the metal floor lodged in a battalion commander's leg.
The major who fired the weapon belonged to the 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment, the new unit that instituted the disciplinary changes. Many soldiers quickly seized on the irony.
"It's almost humorous how far they go with this stuff," said Staff Sgt. Steve Siglock of the 3rd Battalion, 21st Infantry Regiment. "I mean, you're coming back from a patrol. You might have been shot up, you might have had your vehicle blown up and you've got some dude telling you to fix your uniform.
"Let me put it this way: They shot our B.C. in the foot. They got bigger problems than how we blouse our boots."
The 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment took command of northern Iraq shortly after the Jan. 30 parliamentary elections, moving into a palace headquarters once occupied by Saddam Hussein's notorious sons Uday and Qusay. The unit normally runs the military's National Training Center at Fort Irwin, Calif., where it scrutinizes other units in microscopic detail and brooks no deviation from military discipline.
The 11th ACR appears to have applied that mentality to the Stryker Brigade Combat Team, of Fort Lewis, Wash., which does most of the actual fighting in northern Iraq out of 21-ton armored personnel carriers called Strykers. Shortly after the latest Stryker unit, the 1st Brigade of the 25th Infantry Division, arrived last fall, Mosul was convulsed by insurgent violence in the form of bombs, mortars and small-arms fire.
In some ways, the renewed attention to uniform standards is a measure of the Stryker brigade's progress, particularly in Mosul, where attacks have plummeted since the elections.
"Every once in a while you gotta reel it in and say, 'Let's get back to reality,' " said Command Sgt. Maj. Ricky Pring, who enforces military regulations for the 11th ACR. "And I think that's what happened when we showed up. It was kind of like, 'Okay, everything has slowed down, and let's look at ourselves. What can we do better?' "
Pring described the Stryker brigade as "the best unit I've ever seen" but was unapologetic, saying, "Discipline makes our army stronger than any other army on the planet.
"I've been in the army 27 years. A happy soldier is a bitching soldier."
First Sgt. Lance Dyckman, of the Stryker brigade's 3rd Battalion, said, "It is a great sign of how well our army is doing that we're able to take the time out to flagellate ourselves over trivial stuff like this."
Some troops refer to the area around the palace, which is adorned with the 11th ACR's black stallion logo, as the BHPZ, or Black Horse Pedantic Zone.
Unlike Vietnam, where soldiers scrawled peace signs or slogans such as "Born to Kill" on their helmets, soldiers in Iraq rarely deviate from the standard four DCUs, or desert camouflage uniforms, they receive from the military. But they employ a range of tactical attire -- from Wiley X ballistic glasses that protect against shrapnel to special undershirts that soak up sweat during extreme heat to checkered scarves that they hope will endear them to local populations.
Some of the practices are legal under AR 670-1, the army's regulations on uniform wear and conduct, and Iraq Policy 05-05, a seven-page addendum.
Some aren't.
One that immediately came under scrutiny from the 11th ACR was the practice of tucking in shirts on combat missions. Army regulations call for the shirts to be worn out. But many soldiers tuck them in to prevent the flaps from catching on the Strykers and to give them easier access to weapons such as knives and revolvers strapped to their thighs.
The 11th ACR cracked down on the offenders but has since backed off after facing stiff resistance from the Stryker brigade.
Other rules are less flexible. Soldiers not wearing sunglasses can neither push them onto their foreheads nor wear them around their necks but must place them in their pockets. Soldiers walking to the mess hall must wear "headgear." All soldiers must "blouse" their pants above or at the second eyelet of their boots.
Staff Sgt. Brad Evans, of the 3rd Battalion's C Company, said he was walking to the mess hall with Staff Sgt. Victor Birdseye recently, their conversation sprinkled liberally with the most commonly used word in the military.
"Hey sergeant, watch your language," said a passing first sergeant, overhearing the conversation, according to Evans.
Evans said he has come to believe that the 11th ACR "has a separate sergeant major for each thing: one for hats, one for boots, one for gloves."
Even the 3rd Battalion's chaplain believes the rules are excessive for a combat zone. "I mean, I've got soldiers who go outside the wire who get in firefights, who get hit by IEDs [improvised explosive devices], who have had their buddies die in their arms," Capt. Dale Goetz said. He said the rules add to the soldiers' stress by forcing them to focus on "trivial stuff."
"I mean, back off," Goetz said.
Lt. Col. Michael Gibler, the battalion commander who was accidentally shot inside the Stryker, acknowledged the new rules initially created friction but said: "Change is good. Just like any organization, the 11th ACR came in and took a different look at what we're doing. And there's nothing wrong with that."
Gibler said his soldiers needed to realize that "some people have different jobs, and their jobs don't have them out and about every day. And it doesn't make them any less of a soldier, or any less part of the mission."
Pring, the command sergeant major who enforces the regulations, denied that the issue pitted rear-guard soldiers who focused on small rules against those who venture outside the wire.
"I'll bet you 10 bucks I'm outside this FOB just as much as any soldier in the" Stryker Brigade Combat Team, Pring said.
"I'll see his 10 and make it 20," said Spec. Robert Layton of the 3rd Battalion.
Author
Topic: Washington Post article on Uniform Standards In Combat... (Read 1206 times)